Which model focuses on long-term projects but may cause resource allocation conflicts?

The centralized model focuses on consolidating decision-making and resources within a single central authority or team. This approach is often beneficial for long-term projects because it allows for a consistent strategy, streamlined communication, and optimized resource management. The centralized model enables a unified vision and direction, which is critical for projects that require sustained investment and focus over time.

However, one of the challenges associated with this model is the potential for resource allocation conflicts. Since all resources—whether personnel, budget, or technology—are managed centrally, competing projects or initiatives may struggle for attention and funding. This can lead to bottlenecks and delays, as projects may need to be prioritized or deprioritized based on the overarching goals of the organization or the central team’s perspective.

In contrast, the decentralized model allows for more localized control and flexibility, which can mitigate resource conflicts but may lack the cohesive strategy needed for long-term projects. The hybrid model attempts to balance both centralized and decentralized elements but can also lead to complexities in resource management. The center-of-excellence model typically focuses on sharing best practices and expertise rather than directly managing resources for long-term projects. Each of these alternative models presents unique advantages and trade-offs, but the centralized model's particular alignment with long-term project management